DFK-Logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Skill Up
    • Food Safety & Haccp
      • Accredited IHA HACCP Course
      • Food safety / HACCP level 1-4
      • E-learning Food Safety and HACCP
        • Level 1 Food Safety
        • Level 2 Food Safety in Catering
        • Level 3 Food Safety in Catering
        • Level 2 Principles of HACCP
        • Level 2 Food Safety for Manufacturing
        • Level 3 Food Safety in Manufacturing
    • BRCGS Food Safety Standard
    • US FSMA Courses
      • FSPCA PCQI Course
      • FSPCA IAVA Course
      • FSPCA Food Traceability Rule Course
    • Food Labeling Courses
      • FDA Food Labeling Training course
      • EU Food Labeling Training Course
  • FDA & EU Compliance
    • Food Label Compliance Services
    • Risk Assessment & Management
    • Food Safety Culture
    • Compliance & Regulatory Audit
  • Scientific & Advisory
  • Training Calendar
  • DFK Hub
    • DFK Activities
    • DFK Blog
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Skill Up
    • Food Safety & Haccp
      • Accredited IHA HACCP Course
      • Food safety / HACCP level 1-4
      • E-learning Food Safety and HACCP
        • Level 1 Food Safety
        • Level 2 Food Safety in Catering
        • Level 3 Food Safety in Catering
        • Level 2 Principles of HACCP
        • Level 2 Food Safety for Manufacturing
        • Level 3 Food Safety in Manufacturing
    • BRCGS Food Safety Standard
    • US FSMA Courses
      • FSPCA PCQI Course
      • FSPCA IAVA Course
      • FSPCA Food Traceability Rule Course
    • Food Labeling Courses
      • FDA Food Labeling Training course
      • EU Food Labeling Training Course
  • FDA & EU Compliance
    • Food Label Compliance Services
    • Risk Assessment & Management
    • Food Safety Culture
    • Compliance & Regulatory Audit
  • Scientific & Advisory
  • Training Calendar
  • DFK Hub
    • DFK Activities
    • DFK Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Posts tagged "Regulatory compliance"

Tag: Regulatory compliance

Which Facility Must Register With The FDA?

Friday, 27 March 2026 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
I often get questions on FDA registration from both startups and established companies. For example, Does our third-party warehouse need to register with FDA? If it holds food for US consumption, most likely, yes.First, what does the law state? FSMA requires that domestic and foreign facilities that manufacture, process, pack, or hold food for human or animal consumption in the U.S. must register with the FDA. So, a third-party warehouse used exclusively for storing your finished products is still a food holding facility. That brings it within FDA’s registration requirement, regardless of whether it handles products from one company or many. Almost all warehouses that handle food meet at least the “hold” threshold under FSMA, which means they are: 🔸Subject to FDA registration 🔸Expected to have applicable food safety controls in place This applies to domestic and foreign facilities alike. If the facility packs or holds food after the last foreign manufacturer or processor, the foreign packer or holder must also register. In multi-facility chains, more than one site may need registration. Exemptions apply to retail food establishments (restaurants/groceries) and farms holding their own produce are typically exempt. Pure carriers (trucks in transit) are generally not considered facilities, but the warehouses they transfer to are. ❗️NOTE: FDA registration is free See below details on which facility types must register, including scenarios involving multiple foreign facilities. If you have questions about what FDA registration means for your facility, which regulations apply to your operation, or how to design compliant food labels and build a compliant HACCP and Food Safety Plan for the US and EU market, DFK Safe Food Environment provides regulatory consulting, FSPCA training, and FSMA compliance support for domestic and international food businesses.
  • Published in FDA Compliance, FSMA
Tagged under: FDA, FOOD EXPORT, Food Safety, FSMA, Regulatory compliance

51% of DG SANTE Agri-Food Controls in 2026 Target Third Countries: Inside the European Commission’s Audit Programme

Saturday, 28 February 2026 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
The European Commission’s 2026 Health and Food Audits and Analysis Programme sends an important signal to global agri-food exporters. The message is clear:EU import controls are entering a new phase of intensified scrutiny. In response to rising concerns around food safety, regulatory alignment, and the integrity of third-country control systems, the EU is significantly scaling up audits of non-EU countries. The focus areas for 2026 include: 🔸 Pesticide residues🔸 Pharmacologically active substances in animal products🔸 Contaminants and mycotoxins🔸 Food contact materials (including recycled plastics)🔸 Microbiological risks🔸 Animal health and welfare standards The Commission has committed to a 50% increase in audits of non-EU countries between 2025–2027. In 2026 alone, 51% of agri-food controls will target non-EU countries, compared to 33% in 2025. For exporters to the EU market, this marks a structural recalibration of import scrutiny. The emphasis is no longer limited to product-level compliance, it extends to the robustness of official control systems in exporting countries. In times of geopolitical instability and economic uncertainty, regulatory certainty becomes even more critical. The EU is reinforcing its food safety perimeter. If your business exports to the European Union, 2026 will require: 🔸 Robust residue monitoring aligned with EU MRLs🔸 Strong and defensible official certification systems🔸 Full traceability across the supply chain🔸 A documented and demonstrable compliance culture🔸 Preparedness for on-site Commission audits Preparedness is not optional. It is strategic for market growth and business expansion. Below is the list of sectors falling under heightened European Commission scrutiny in 2026, together with the planned audits for non-EU countries. dfk DFK Safe Food Environment · Regulatory Services EU Food SafetyIncreased Audits 2026 Food categories under highest scrutiny in third-country controls, verified from the European Commission DG SANTE Health and Food Audits and Analysis Programme 2026 159 Total Controls 51% Non-EU Focus, up from 33% 150 Audits Planned ~50% Increase in non-EU audit share 2025-27 Food Categories Ranked by Planned Audit Intensity, Third Countries # Food Category and Scope Audits Relative Intensity Priority 1 Fish, Fishery Products and Fish Oil China, Chile, Oman, Panama, Türkiye, Uruguay; plus 7 desk-based audits (Papua New Guinea, Senegal, Cabo Verde, Solomon Islands, Taiwan, Nigeria, Malaysia) 13audits High 2 Residues of Pharmacologically Active Substances, Food of Animal Origin Tunisia, Panama, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Republic of Korea, Bangladesh, Uruguay, Türkiye, Moldova, plus 1 TBD; desk-based assessment of 30 non-EU countries 10audits High 3 Plants and Plant Products, Phytosanitary Controls Uganda, Costa Rica, China, Japan (Bonsai), Peru, Thailand, plus 1 TBD 7audits High 4 Pesticide Residues, Food of Plant Origin Kenya, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Madagascar 5audits High 5 Food Contact Materials, Recycled Plastics United Kingdom, India, Türkiye, China; first coordinated audit programme on this topic launched in 2026 4audits New Topic 6 Meat and Meat Products, Beef and Poultry Brazil (beef), Argentina (poultry and wild hare), United Kingdom (beef), Uruguay (beef) 4audits Medium 7 Animal Health, Poultry Meat and Eggs China, Thailand, United States 3audits Medium 8 Live Bivalve Molluscs Japan, Vietnam 2audits Medium 9 Microbiological Safety, Food of Non-Animal Origin Serbia, Türkiye 2audits Medium 10 Contaminants, Food of Non-Animal Origin United States; Türkiye (product-specific details per Annex 4 country audit descriptions: aflatoxin in peanuts; mycotoxins in pistachios and dried figs) 2audits Medium Primary Risk Concerns Driving the 2026 Audit Programme Pesticide Residues (MRL Compliance) Veterinary Drug Residues Mycotoxins and Aflatoxins Microbiological Safety Food Contact Material Migration Animal Disease Certification Chemical Contaminants (incl. heavy metals, where relevant) Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Countries Facing Multiple Audit Topics in 2026 Türkiye Vet. drug residues, pesticides and contaminants Fishery product production controls Food contact materials (recycled plastic) Mycotoxins in pistachios and dried figs Microbiological safety (FNAO) Food irradiation facilities China Poultry meat and eggs, animal health Fish oil for human consumption Food contact materials (recycled plastic) Plant and plant products export controls Uruguay Fishery products Beef production controls Vet. drug residues and contaminants Bangladesh Pesticide residues, food of plant origin Vet. drug residues and contaminants Panama Fish oil for human consumption Vet. drug residues and contaminants Thailand Poultry meat and eggs, animal health Pesticide residues, food of plant origin Plant and plant products export controls New Audit Topics Launched in 2026 Fish Oil: first coordinated audit programme on this topic, covering China, Chile, Oman, Panama; EU Member States France and Germany, targeting products for human consumption. Food Contact Materials with Recycled Plastics: first coordinated audit programme on this topic in EU (Netherlands, Poland) and third countries (UK, India, Türkiye, China), addressing chemical migration risks from recycled packaging. How Audit Outcomes Affect Market Access A negative Commission audit outcome in a third country can trigger trade-restrictive measures including enhanced border checks or import suspension. Audits verify the competent authority’s official control system, not just individual product lots. Results are published on the DG SANTE audit portal and inform EU import policy decisions. Source: EC DG SANTE · Health and Food Audits and Analysis Programme 2026 · EW-01-25-098-EN-N dfk Safe Food Environment
  • Published in EU regulatory compliance, Food safety and trade
Tagged under: Food Safety, Regulatory compliance, Risk assessment

When Supplier Controls Matter More Than Your Own CCPs

Monday, 16 February 2026 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
A single ingredient , pre-cooked pasta, caused 7 deaths, 28 illnesses, 27 hospitalizations and brought 6+ brands into recall. This multistate Listeria monocytogenes outbreak was linked to prepared, ready-to-eat pasta meals. We are not here to speculate about failure or assign blame. But we should reflect. Irrespective of this specific case, where the exact root cause and system robustness are not fully clear, such incidents remind us of something critical: It is time for food safety to move beyond a purely HACCP-centered mindset. HACCP asks: That logic is vital, indispensable. But it is not sufficient. When conducting risk assessments and determining management strategies, food businesses must go beyond labeling controls as CCPs or PRPs. We need a broader, risk-based Food Safety Plan mindset. In cases like this, pre-cooked, hydrated components used in RTE foods inherently require elevated scrutiny not because something necessarily failed, but because the risk profile demands it. A broader system means: • Strong supply-chain preventive controls for high-risk ingredients.HACCP often treats supplier controls as PRPs. A Food Safety Plan treats high-risk incoming ingredients as Supply Chain Preventive Controls, applying CCP-equivalent rigor. • Sanitation Preventive Controls when the hazard is environmentalWhen environmental contamination is a reasonably foreseeable hazard, sanitation is no longer “just a PRP”, it becomes a managed preventive control. • Allergen Preventive Controls where cross-contact risk is significant.When severity is high, allergen management requires structured and robust preventive controls. • Verification beyond documentation.Does your supplier have validated preventive controls?Are you reviewing real performance data and environmental monitoring trends — not just Certificates of Analysis? • Environmental monitoring expectations at supplier level, where relevant. • Risk-based intensity of oversight proportional to severity. • and more…. Food Safety Plans change how we think. They shift us from diagram compliance to hazard-control strategy design. And that shift is not theoretical. It is necessary. If you manufacture or brand RTE foods, your strongest critical control may ALSO sit at your supplier’s site. I have prepared a very simplified illustration showing how HACCP and a Food Safety Plan approach may differ, both at the level of the pre-cooked pasta manufacturer and at the level of the brand owner using it in finished RTE products. Have a look at it here: If you have questions about what FDA registration means for your facility, which regulations apply to your operation, or how to design compliant food labels and build a compliant HACCP and Food Safety Plan for the US and EU market, DFK Safe Food Environment provides regulatory consulting, FSPCA training, and FSMA compliance support for domestic and international food businesses.
  • Published in FDA Compliance, Food safety and trade, FSMA
Tagged under: #foodsafetyplan, #fsp, #HACCP, #riskmanagement, Food Safety, Regulatory compliance, Risk assessment
GRAS_or_Food_Additive

EU Compliance Is Not FDA Compliance: What Ingredient Status Means for US Market Access

Thursday, 29 January 2026 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
If raw materials aren’t fully FDA-compliant but EU compliant, can we still sell the product in the US ? This question comes up often with complex formulations. From an FDA perspective, the logic is simple. Pointing to approval in other jurisdictions, relying on a long history of use elsewhere, or assuming that a low use level or a so-called “minor” ingredient will be overlooked is not a good argument or approach to access the US market. These factors may feel reassuring, but they do not establish legal status under FDA rules. What does work is a disciplined regulatory approach by mapping each ingredient and sub-ingredient to its US regulatory status, verifying that the intended use levels and conditions of use are covered, and reformulating where no valid approval or GRAS pathway exists. I have prepared this illustration that summarizes the decision logic used to determine a substance’s regulatory and legal status, and shows where compliance ultimately leads to the need for food additive authorization. If you find it useful and choose to share it, attribution would be appreciated. If you have questions, feel free to reach out anytime. We support food businesses with food labeling compliance, risk assessment and management, and food system compliance with the FDA. If you have questions about what FDA registration means for your facility, which regulations apply to your operation, or how to design compliant food labels and build a compliant HACCP and Food Safety Plan for the US and EU market, DFK Safe Food Environment provides regulatory consulting, FSPCA training, and FSMA compliance support for domestic and international food businesses.
  • Published in FDA Compliance, FSMA
Tagged under: FDA, Food Safety, Regulatory compliance, Risk assessment

DFK Expands Support for Food Brewer’s Innovative Products

Thursday, 11 December 2025 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
Following a successful year of partnership, DFK is pleased to announce the extension of its collaboration with Food Brewer. Building on the progress and achievements of the past year, the renewed agreement expands our scope of support to include comprehensive regulatory compliance advisory services for Food Brewer’s cell-cultured and plant-based cocoa and coffee products. Under this extended scope, DFK will continue to provide specialized regulatory and quality assurance support, including guidance on documentation, HACCP plan enhancement, labeling compliance, and supplier verification systems. The service package also includes periodic regulatory updates and tailored advisory sessions to assist Food Brewer in navigating emerging regulatory landscapes for innovative food technologies. This collaboration reflects DFK’s ongoing commitment to supporting forward-thinking food companies in achieving compliance excellence and advancing sustainable, next-generation food solutions.
Tagged under: cell-cultured food, HACCP, novel food, Regulatory compliance, Risk assessment
workshop

DFK Supports SMEs and Stakeholders Through the USAID TRADE Project on Export Enhancement Program

Tuesday, 26 March 2024 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
As part of the Export Enhancement Program under the USAID TRADE project, in collaboration with the Food Export Council (FEC), DFK has been dedicated to supporting SMEs and key stakeholders by enhancing their knowledge and capabilities. This initiative, which began in September 2022, continued through multiple training sessions held on: The objective of these sessions was to train and build the capacity of industry delegates and trainers on the FDA requirements under the FSMA preventive controls rule key and topics essential for international trade compliance and food safety, including: This effort continued through 2024 with the development of Trainer of Trainers (ToT) guidance documents, including: Through this project, DFK is empowering SMEs with the critical knowledge and skills needed to meet international standards, fostering safer food products and enhancing export capabilities.
Tagged under: FDA, FOOD EXPORT, Food Safety, FOOD TRADE, FSMA, PCQI, Regulatory compliance

DFK Empowers FEC Members for Global Food Export Success – A USAID Trade Reform & Development Projecy in Egypt (TRADE)

Tuesday, 26 September 2023 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
DFK has been entrusted with the development and delivery of an extensive training program as part of the three-day Export Enhancement Program, held by USAID TRADE, in collaboration with the Food Export Council (FEC), from 24-26 July, 2023 at FEC premises. With a remarkable turnout of over 60 participants, the workshop delved into vital topics, including EU and US food labeling requirements and allergen control programs. Its overarching goal was to fortify the capabilities of FEC members, enabling them to not only meet rigorous EU and US food safety regulations but also to thrive in expanding their presence in export markets. The upcoming training session scheduled for the end of November 2023 will focus on the development of a Food Safety Culture plan. Stay tuned for further updates on our journey to elevate food safety standards and empower our partners in the industry.
Tagged under: EU food labeling, EU food safety regulations, FOOD EXPORT, food labeling, Regulatory compliance, US food labeling, US food safety regulations

DFK Continues Its Collaboration with the Food Export Council, Delivering Guidance on FDA FSMA and Traceability RequirementsJuly 2023 – Cairo, Egypt

Sunday, 23 July 2023 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
For the second consecutive year, DFK has strengthened its collaboration with the Food Export Council (FEC) to support Egyptian food manufacturers and exporters in meeting international regulatory requirements. As part of this ongoing partnership, Dr. Dima Faour-Klingbeil delivered a webinar in July focused on the U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and the FDA’s Food Traceability Rule. The webinar organized and hosted by the FEC provided exporters with essential guidance for accessing and maintaining compliance in the U.S. food market. Dr. Faour-Klingbeil outlined the transformative nature of FSMA, the most comprehensive reform of U.S. food safety law in decades, which shifts the regulatory system from reacting to food safety incidents to preventing them. During the session, she explained FSMA’s core principles, including preventive controls, inspection and compliance mechanisms, import oversight, and the FDA’s authority to act swiftly on products suspected of contamination. She highlighted key rules that foreign suppliers must understand and especially the Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP), which requires U.S. importers to verify that their foreign suppliers meet U.S. standards. A major focus of the webinar was the FDA’s Food Traceability Rule, which expands traceability requirements across the global food supply chain. Dr. Faour-Klingbeil detailed the obligations for documenting Key Data Elements (KDEs) and Critical Tracking Events (CTEs), underscoring the rule’s significance for high-risk foods and the need for robust record-keeping systems to enhance recall efficiency and supply-chain transparency. Dr. Faour-Klingbeil urged Egyptian exporters to proactively strengthen their compliance systems to avoid border rejections and improve their competitiveness in the U.S. FEC emphasized that these training initiatives form part of a broader strategy to expand export capabilities and support companies participating in major global trade events. For more information, Watch the webinar in this link:
Tagged under: FDA, FOOD EXPORT, FSMA, FSMA204, Regulatory compliance, Traceability rule

PCQI WORKSHOP – USAID Trade Reform & Development in Egypt (TRADE) 2023

Friday, 24 March 2023 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
For the second year, and as part of the integrated capacity enhancement initiative of the USAID TRADE project to strengthen the Egyptian Food Export Council (FEC) and their members’ capacity to access the US market, Dr Faour-Klingbeil delivered the official course “Preventive Controls Qualified Individual (PCQI)” for 12 SMEs at the FEC premises from 07.- 09.03.2023. The course aimed to support Egyptian SMEs in the food sector better understand how to develop a Food Safety Plan and meet the FDA food safety requirements to improve regulatory compliance and enhance food exports.
Tagged under: FOOD EXPORT, Food Safety, FOOD TRADE, Regulatory compliance

FEC Webinar on the FSMA rules and the FDA requirements for food export – Egypt

Wednesday, 25 January 2023 by Dr Faour Klingbeil
Dr Faour-Klingbeil offered a presentation on the FSMA rules and the FDA Requirements for Food Export during a webinar organized by the Food Export Council in Egypt on 18.01.2023 and attended by more than 95 participants. What are the FSMA rules? how does FSMA affects foreign facilities? what are the steps to meet the FDA requirements for food export? What is the responsibility of the PCQI? Watch here:
Tagged under: FDA, FSMA, PCQI, Regulatory compliance

WANT TO KEEP YOURSELF UPDATED ON FSMA ISSUES?

Join my mailing list for receiving free resources and updates on FDA industry guidance and the latest on the US food safety regulatory requirements

Upcoming Events

May 21
FSPCA IA Conducting Vulnerability Assessments (IA VA) – Instructor-Led Online Course
08:30 - 17:30
May 27 - 28
FSPCA Food Traceability Rule – Instructor-Led Online Course
08:30 - 15:30
Online
1 2 … 6
LogoNew-1

DFK for Safe Food Environment is a food safety consulting business that provides scientific, regulatory, and technical services to food businesses.

Read More
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin Rg-icon RG

Our Location

Ottweilerst. 14 A 30559 Hanover, Germany Registered in Hannover, Germany
USt-IdNr.: DE312857816

Contact

dima@dfkfoodsafety.com

  • Privacy Policy

Useful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • What We Do
  • Our Expertise & Services
  • Skill Up
  • Consultancy
  • DFK Activities
  • Training Calendar
  • DFK BLOG
  • Contact Us

Affiliates & Partners

fspca
charted
haccp_logo
2025 © DFK for Safe Food Environment. All rights reserved.

Website Designed and Developed by entasiz